I have noted that, when measuring patches with Pgenerator, regardless I use a dedicated P2P Ethernet connection or a networked one, if I experience a PC load situation, there are some behaviours that I think need to be investigate. Load can be usually generated activating apps, or more simply, running, during a profile execution, a LUT tools. I have verified what looks to me the most network usage case, i,e, rectangular patches with FS stabilisation.
What happens with CS listening to OK Pgenerator messages, is, that, following that overload, CS starts measuring the stabilisation patches.

I have also verified that with a previous CS sw version, only the patch being run close overload, is affected.
Here what I have seen on the IP interface for the different cases:First let me summarise the way CS works with FS stabilisation and window patches:
Legend:
(FS=Full Size, WD=WinDow)
Patch sending sequence
(FS=Full Size, WD=WinDow)
;Patch 1
STAB FS
STAB WD (At FS Delay)
PATCH WD 1
PATH FS (At PB Delay)
;Patch 2
STAB FS
STAB WD (At FS Delay)
PATCH WD 2
PATCH FS (At PB Delay)
;Patch 3
STAB FS
STAB WD (At FS Delay)
PATCH WD 3
PATCH FS (At PB Delay)
In case of OK listening, I see the following:
Stab Delay = 1 sec
Probe Delay = 2 Secs + integ = up to 3 Sec
I have added tracing sequence number for easier location i the tracing file I have annexed
STAB FS (548)
STAB WD (606 At FS Delay)
PATCH WD 327 (608)
PATCH FS 327 (1719 At PB Delay)
PATCH FS 371 (1721)
PATCH FS 371 (2011 At PB Delay)
STAB FS (2013)
STAB WD (2262 At 8 secs)
PATCH WD 414 (2264)
PATCH FS 414 (2266)
STAB FS (2268)
STAB WD (2294 at Probe Delay)
PATCH WD 458 (2296)
PATCH FS 458 (2298)
STAB FS (2300)
STAB WD (2361 At FS Delay)
PATCH WD 502 (2363)
PATCH FS (2423 at PB Delay - PB integration)
STAB FS (2425)
STAB WD (2475 at PB Delay)
After WD 371 measurement (2011), stab FS stays on the screen for 8 seconds. The profile says that a STAB is read instead of 414. It looks like Patch 414 has been overlapped by STAB.
In the case CS does not listen to Pgenerator OK's (previous releases) I see the following:

I.E., A bunch of patches 3 patches are sent to the Pgenerator. It appears there is a possible bug in the Pgenerator as the first patch (stabilisation) has been displayed, but the sequence is respected, with a probe delay of 2.2 sec. It appears as an issue with Pgenerator, whose development group has been informed.
It is quite difficult for me to point out the root cause as I don't know enough details about CS implementation.
I am under the impression that during heavy load, CS cannot send patches. Looking at the previous release, it appears they have been buffered up to the patch one and later sent.
In the same condition, it looks that the listening mechanism has broken the above mechanism. Off course, I cannot know if a different mechanism has been implemented and has some bugs.
Note: interesting that I could not see any case in which Pgenerator patch response has been delayed. All the time I see an ok with a maximum delay of 3 msec